You are here

Proxy Bypass

4 posts / 0 new
Last post
poundsblake
Offline
Last seen: 13 years 11 months ago
Joined: 2010-05-07 15:19
Proxy Bypass

I know a great application that bypasses the proxy, but it is not compatible with MAC... and it sucks a lot. It's called Ultra Surf. The website is ultrareach.com It works really good on your flash drive. It just should be formated for portableapps.

Pyromaniac
Pyromaniac's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 years 2 weeks ago
Developer
Joined: 2008-09-30 19:18
According to Avira

and a 4 antivirus programs on virustotal.com, it is a virus.
See also WOT comment below:
http://www.mywot.com/en/scorecard/ultrareach.com/comment-6260588

Antivirus;Version;Last Update;Result
a-squared;5.0.0.26;2010.06.14;-
AhnLab-V3;2010.06.15.00;2010.06.15;-
AntiVir;8.2.2.6;2010.06.14;-
Antiy-AVL;2.0.3.7;2010.06.11;-
Authentium;5.2.0.5;2010.06.14;-
Avast;4.8.1351.0;2010.06.14;-
Avast5;5.0.332.0;2010.06.14;-
AVG;9.0.0.787;2010.06.15;-
BitDefender;7.2;2010.06.15;-
CAT-QuickHeal;10.00;2010.06.14;(Suspicious) - DNAScan
ClamAV;0.96.0.3-git;2010.06.15;-
Comodo;5103;2010.06.15;-
DrWeb;5.0.2.03300;2010.06.15;-
eSafe;7.0.17.0;2010.06.14;Win32.Corrupt.Ep
eTrust-Vet;36.1.7634;2010.06.15;-
F-Prot;4.6.0.103;2010.06.14;-
F-Secure;9.0.15370.0;2010.06.15;-
Fortinet;4.1.133.0;2010.06.14;-
GData;21;2010.06.15;-
Ikarus;T3.1.1.84.0;2010.06.14;-
Jiangmin;13.0.900;2010.06.14;-
Kaspersky;7.0.0.125;2010.06.15;-
McAfee;5.400.0.1158;2010.06.15;-
McAfee-GW-Edition;2010.1;2010.06.14;Heuristic.BehavesLike.Exploit.CodeExec.EOLO
Microsoft;1.5802;2010.06.14;-
NOD32;5196;2010.06.14;-
Norman;6.04.12;2010.06.14;-
nProtect;2010-06-14.02;2010.06.14;-
Panda;10.0.2.7;2010.06.14;-
PCTools;7.0.3.5;2010.06.14;-
Prevx;3.0;2010.06.15;-
Rising;22.51.06.01;2010.06.13;-
Sophos;4.54.0;2010.06.15;-
Sunbelt;6448;2010.06.15;-
Symantec;20101.1.0.89;2010.06.14;-
TheHacker;6.5.2.0.298;2010.06.14;-
TrendMicro;9.120.0.1004;2010.06.14;-
TrendMicro-HouseCall;9.120.0.1004;2010.06.15;-
VBA32;3.12.12.5;2010.06.14;-
ViRobot;2010.6.14.3884;2010.06.14;-
VirusBuster;5.0.27.0;2010.06.14;Packed/Execryptor

Additional information
File size: 473743 bytes
MD5...: e44f5667382356fcb40994326ea462f2
SHA1..: 993437c7614ef6736118318e6fe1a4e7150c02ae
SHA256: cc862c32cb485b199763b0bd5c0932f3eb1c6b3df84c8ba0d3202115c88cfb1b
ssdeep: 6144:eqQHEQh9przViNdG+5vWzeo1XfEb/ZqgRcDkJAXCGQ69IstkG/CpihQcvm:uHPfprENc+5seoN4qgyYJsvQuIsSpi7e
PEiD..: -
PEInfo: -
RDS...: NSRL Reference Data Set-
trid..: ZIP compressed archive (100.0%)
packers (Kaspersky): Execryptor
packers (F-Prot): EXECryptor
pdfid.: -
sigcheck:publisher....: n/acopyright....: n/aproduct......: n/adescription..: n/aoriginal name: n/ainternal name: n/afile version.: n/acomments.....: n/asigners......: -signing date.: -verified.....: Unsigned
Jimbo
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
Joined: 2007-12-17 05:43
That's not a bad report, actually

Basically, virustotal says that

Thirty seven AV apps say that it is clean

One said that it had been compressed
(VirusBuster;5.0.27.0;2010.06.14;Packed/Execryptor)

Two say that some bits of it look a bit like something they once saw in a malware, using their heuristic scanner
(CAT-QuickHeal;10.00;2010.06.14;(Suspicious) - DNAScan
McAfee-GW-Edition;2010.1;2010.06.14;Heuristic.BehavesLike.Exploit.CodeExec.EOLO)

And one says that it actually recognises it as a specific malware
(eSafe;7.0.17.0;2010.06.14;Win32.Corrupt.Ep)

I'm not saying that it isn't malware, I'm just pointing out that we've had much higher hit-rates than that as false positives on apps from here that we know to be clean.

Bahamut
Bahamut's picture
Offline
Last seen: 12 years 4 months ago
Joined: 2006-04-07 08:44
4 out of 30-something ain't bad

That's a pretty good score. A lot of AV programs are very eager to flag packed executables as malicious. However, the comment left by brigrove on that WOT link is pretty damning.

Vintage!

Log in or register to post comments