You are here

Suggestion: include XULRunner in Common Files

7 posts / 0 new
Last post
computerfreaker
computerfreaker's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 11 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2009-08-11 11:24
Suggestion: include XULRunner in Common Files

I know the majority of PortableApps releases don't rely on XULRunner, but some do. Since XULRunner weighs in at a hefty 22MB, wouldn't it be a good idea to create one XULRunner installer, which would put XULRunner in Common Files (like Java Portable does with Java), instead of bundling XULRunner with every app that needs it?
PAL could also get another Activate entry to benefit from this:

[Activate]
XULRunner=true
John T. Haller
John T. Haller's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 11 min ago
AdminDeveloperModerator
Joined: 2005-11-28 22:21
Unsupported

Most XULRunner-based apps require a specific version, usually with custom stuff included, which is incompatible with other apps. Most apps can't reference an external one at all.

Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!

computerfreaker
computerfreaker's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 11 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2009-08-11 11:24
So, for all practical

So, for all practical purposes, XULRunner is like GTK (in terms of apps needing their own version, etc.)?

"The question I would like to know, is the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything. All we know about it is that the Answer is Forty-two, which is a little aggravating."

John T. Haller
John T. Haller's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 11 min ago
AdminDeveloperModerator
Joined: 2005-11-28 22:21
Worse

Actually, I'd say it's worse, as none of the major apps (Firefox, Thunderbird, Sunbird, Songbird, etc) have ever been able to share a XULRunner instance.

Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!

computerfreaker
computerfreaker's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 11 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2009-08-11 11:24
Wow, that's ugly. Why is

Wow, that's ugly. Why is everything so non-standard?
A troubling idea just occurred to me. If two apps that use different versions of XULRunner are run at the same time, would the two XULRunners conflict with each other?

"The question I would like to know, is the Ultimate Question of Life, the Universe and Everything. All we know about it is that the Answer is Forty-two, which is a little aggravating."

John T. Haller
John T. Haller's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 hours 11 min ago
AdminDeveloperModerator
Joined: 2005-11-28 22:21
Nope

They're independent.

Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!

J Neutron
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 6 min ago
Joined: 2008-06-10 19:26
Uh....

Gee, doesn't that sound a lot like the way Windows works, and why portable applications are better?

neutron1132 (at) usa (dot) com

Log in or register to post comments