Firfox 2.0 is going to include a built-in session manager. Since session managers tend to be an exceedingly bad idea when FFP is installed on a flash drive, I wanted to know if this was going to cause problems. I *think* the session manager is only operative when you perform an update or install an extension, so it shouldn't slow down normal opperation the way most session managers do, but I thought I'd check.
New: Kanri (Oct 9, '24), Platform 29.5.3 (Jun 27, '24)
1,100+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
No Ads November!, Please donate today
Visit the Community page
Join our forums
Subscribe to our email newsletter
Subscribe with RSS
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Mastodon
Follow us on BlueSky
We may have to disable it.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!
I've been using 2.0 since before it was called that and I have never had a problem such a slow downs, in fact it was faster than my copy of 1.5.
Yours
Steve Lamerton
Bon Echo?
And what was 3.0?
----
R McCue
PortaBlog Home and My Website
And before anyone complains about the grammar, I'm so jetlagged that my
hands aren't even in the same time zone...
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate."
Yes, 2.0 was Bon Echo, and 3.0 is Minefield.
You are slipping into bad habits! https://portableapps.com/search/node/bon+echo+minefield
~Lurk~
~Lurk~
And I was the person who posted it
I actually knew it was, I was just asking in case I was wrong, which I frequently am.
----
R McCue
PortaBlog Home and My Website
And before anyone complains about the grammar, I'm so jetlagged that my
hands aren't even in the same time zone...
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate."