Pardon me if I put this into the wrong section, a mod can move to where need be if so.
I was thinking, What are all the possible things you can think of that you can('t) do with the Apache License 2.0?
http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
Since I'm not a fan of advanced english, Maybe you guys can explain.
Wikipedia has useful summaries on most such licenses.
I am a Christian and a developer and moderator here.
“A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.” – Proverbs 15:1
Wait, isn't english your first language? I hate Spanish class, and yet, you love it?data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/6ade1/6ade1eb19a6a978624a1930ed04bf5e6e0a38f08" alt="Blum"
It's a drag to sit there and read all of that since I don't have the time.
What I /really/ needed to know is if GNU GPL3 could contain crap that included the Apache License. I /think/ it can. idk.
Na na na, come on!
The Apache License is essentially BSD. Apache 2.0 is GPL compatible.
Insert original signature here with Greasemonkey Script.