I have, or I've had a few suspects, but I need to investigate them more. What are you experiences through the history of PortableApps.com?
You are here
Please Help Support Us
Please help support us by making a donation so we can keep bringing you awesome free software. We accept credit card, wire transfer, PayPal, cryptocurrency, and more.
If you recently donated, thank you!
Visit the Community page
Join our forums
Subscribe to our email newsletter
Subscribe with RSS
Follow us on BlueSky
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Mastodon
Follow us on Twitter
One. Mozilla Firefox: https://portableapps.com/node/57428
I suspect (and if my memory doesn't fool me) where there is one, there should be more.
its not a bug, its feature
Otto Sykora
Basel, Switzerland
https://portableapps.com/node/57424#comment-235767
I just didn't want to put the latest post which might be of interest not only to you in the middle of the conversation rather than putting it to the end, where everyone who is looking for the newest post is reasonably searching for it.
PA.c just takes advantage of that which Mozilla built into Firefox. The program code is Mozilla's. If there were a bug, Mozilla put it there.
It might be, but being it not advertised is also a feature, or advertising the difference is a room for improvement in Firefox Portable's case? ) https://portableapps.com/node/57428#comment-235766
So for one, I've found Firefox Portable to behave differently out of the box than Mozilla Firefox. Are there any other PortableApps.com software from which I should expect different behavior than stock, or Firefox Portable is the only one?