Is it possible to portablize apps w/ all the required net 2.0 files inside
New: DesktopSnowOK (Jan 6, 2025), Platform 29.5.3 (Jun 27, 2024)
1,100+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
No Ads Nov/Dec/Jan!, Please donate today
New: DesktopSnowOK (Jan 6, 2025), Platform 29.5.3 (Jun 27, 2024)
1,100+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
No Ads Nov/Dec/Jan!, Please donate today
Visit the Community page
Join our forums
Subscribe to our email newsletter
Subscribe with RSS
Follow us on BlueSky
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Mastodon
Follow us on Twitter
It's very hard depending on registry and system.
It's only possible via virtualizing , look at thinstall.com , there is a free virtualized NET 1 , 2 and 3 download able
Then you coul'd start the portable via a cmd over the virt. NET
but Mono works pretty well. It doesn't work with all apps, but it is Open Source. I don't know how portable it is, but I think that it can be made portable.
Blue is everything.
No one cares enough to make it portable but it would be still possible thought. Think it`s same with java, john has portable java but he don`t want to give it us yet.
John can't give it to us because JAVA is not yet fully open source. He has to wait until the JRE becomes open source, and then he'll be able to release it.
_____________________________
I don't believe in signatures
The developer formerly known as ZGitRDun8705
John can't give it to us unless he changes his mind about not-open progs here or releases it in another place.
"Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do." Asimov
Is not about "changing minds" it's about legal restrictions... Do you want to face a trial for piracy? Not me, and I'm sure John neither...
------------------
I have no signature again...
If a packet hits a pocket on a socket on a port,
and the bus is interrupted as a very last resort,
and the address of the memory makes your floppy disk abort,
then the socket packet pocket has an error to report
Being open-source has nothing to do with licenses. There are commercial open-source products and free closed-source. And there was a rumour that John contacted Sun about distribution...Of course if he gets a refusal, distribution would be piracy. I assumed that Portable Java will be blessed by Sun's officials.
ADDED: Of course, being free or commercial also has nothing to do with distribution policy. The commercial-open source part was just meant as example.
"Those people who think they know everything are a great annoyance to those of us who do." Asimov
I can say one thing and one thing only. John is in talks.
----
Ryan McCue.
Blog.
So all that Airbus-delay trouble over here in Europe is because of YOU!
Simeon.
"If you're not part of the solution, you're part of the precipitate."
He wants to host apps that aren't open source, he has no place to host them now because all of his OS apps are at Sourceforge, that's why he's been working on creating a freeware server.
_____________________________
I don't believe in signatures
The developer formerly known as ZGitRDun8705
(Java is Open Source now... But this is not the reason for this post.)
I did beg John to publish instructions to make java portable. He [b]could[/b], be he don`t [b]want[/b]. No legal issues with instructions how to make a own portable version.
Java is going open source, they havent fully gone OS yet. Anyway, John posted a Java Portablizer at:
https://portableapps.com/downloads/Java_Portablizer_1.1.paf.exe
It takes a local installed copy, and copies it to your portable device.
Also, several other people have posted instructions on making the JRE portable, just do a quick search.
_____________________________
I don't believe in signatures
The developer formerly known as ZGitRDun8705