You are here

Diff? on Flash speed in running PAs?

5 posts / 0 new
Last post
cadabra
Offline
Last seen: 15 years 6 months ago
Joined: 2007-03-20 15:15
Diff? on Flash speed in running PAs?

Hi -

I am looking to buy a 4 or 8 GB flash drive, and want to figure out how many bucks I should put towards faster read / write times, for use on Win XP?

Running portable apps - I see 10 mb/s write, 20, 30; 5, 7, 10, 19, 200 read times.

Also should I steer clear of the ReadyBoost models - seems like memory is set aside for Vista, which I cannot access?

Also want to uninstall all stuff they come with - migo, syncing stuff, etc., so I can use the apps I want from this site.

If this is not the right forum for these questions, please tell me of one.

Tahnks...

Shawn Faucher
Shawn Faucher's picture
Offline
Last seen: 14 years 10 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2007-10-23 22:14
It's important

Go with the fastest you can afford. It makes a big difference on how responsive your portable apps will be. You want something with at least 20 write speed. Mine has 25-30 and it's fast enough that I don't have to worry about tweaking apps to limit writes. Reads are generally not a problem if the drive has fast write speeds.

formerly rayven01

rab040ma
Offline
Last seen: 1 week 29 min ago
Joined: 2007-08-27 13:35
Flash vs mechanical

Sometimes the 8GB flash models cost about as much as mechanical drives of much higher capacity, which might have better performance too. Depends on what you are trying to achieve. Flash might be less susceptible to mechanical problems (dropping) but is definitely susceptible to failure after a relatively low number of writes (>10,000 but still relatively low).

Definitely get the best you can afford, using your own definition of best. You may care more about performance than security, for example, whereas someone else would be willing to sacrifice a bit of performance for a better password protection scheme.

The software that comes with removable drives is optional. You could copy it off to a CD or something in case you want to play with it later. But it also (in it's pre-installed form) uses relatively little space.

I thought Readyboost was configurable -- doesn't it only uses the storage you designate for it? The space you configure is no longer available, but that's your choice. The other thing about ReadyBoost is that drives have to have pretty decent performance to carry that label. Maybe someone here knows if "Readyboost capable" drives sacrifice anything if they aren't configured or used for Readyboost?

MC

cadabra
Offline
Last seen: 15 years 6 months ago
Joined: 2007-03-20 15:15
OK - where to go for hardwre ?

Thank you for the advice. I would love to buy the Corsair GT voyager but that one is a bit too pricey. I talked with their tech support, and said (my reading between the lines) that they discontinued the GT models because the prices were too high - they didn't find a market that wanted that level performance for that price point. I wish there was a hardware forum here.

Thanks agin.

Shawn Faucher
Shawn Faucher's picture
Offline
Last seen: 14 years 10 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2007-10-23 22:14
RE: Hardware

Well that explains why the voyager GT has been disappearing from online stores recently.. I would suggest the SanDisk Cruzer Contour, available in 4, 8 and soon 16GB. I have an 8GB and the performance is just as fast as a voyager GT, plus I like the packaging better. It's stood up to 6 months of riding around in my pocket full of keys, pocket knife, coins, etc with barely a scratch and no usage issues, plus there's no cap to lose. You can get the 8 for $80ish online (tigerdirect.com for one). I am upgrading to the 16 when it comes out (current eta 3/7) so I can carry a full Linux VM and still have plenty of room for PortableApps! Smile

formerly rayven01

Log in or register to post comments