Did you ever decide whether to change, for example, Portable Firefox to Firefox Portable?
New: System Informer (Apr 21, 2024), Platform 29.4 (Apr 10, 2024)
1,000+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
Please donate today
New: System Informer (Apr 21, 2024), Platform 29.4 (Apr 10, 2024)
1,000+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
Please donate today
Visit the Community page
Join our forums
Subscribe to our email newsletter
Subscribe with RSS
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Mastodon
Follow us on BlueSky
Decided to stick with it the way it was. It would have broken some stuff that people are basing on Portable Firefox (et al) and there's quite a bit of name recognition for it already. The feedback from others was probably about 2/3 keep it, 1/3 change... maybe fewer on chang... so that played a factor, too.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!
I was all for the name change, as it makes organization easier. Rather than a bunch of "Portable XXXX" it would be "XXXX Portable" with the tool name listed fist. It just seems easier to associate it with the non-portable version
On your own portable drive, once you've download, you can rename PortableFirefox.exe to Firefox.exe if you'd like.
Or ImSoGladIDontHaveToUseIE.exe if you were so inclined.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!
Actually, don't name it firefox.exe. It will trigger the multiple instance detection.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!