You are here

illegal Distribtuion of Firefox Portable

17 posts / 0 new
Last post
alpha1
alpha1's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 years 11 months ago
Joined: 2007-07-08 20:02
illegal Distribtuion of Firefox Portable

This site http://www.torproject.org/download.html.en, is illegal distributing a version of our Portable Firefox, with it's Package found here http://www.torproject.org/torbrowser/index.html.en

Because of the Mozilla copyright and the copyrights of portableapps.com They should not be allowed to Distribute Portable Firefox without the specific permission from Mozilla, which I doubt they have, should They have I, my mistake.

It has our complete portable Firefox, launcher, Help files and source, which even includes Firefox's license.

John, please check them out, and report them to Mozilla, if they do not have the permissions to do this, which would be highly unlikely.

EDIT- The IM package also gives out Pidgin Portable, but I don't think that's illegal.

David Dixon II
David Dixon II's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 years 2 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2007-06-11 22:54
Uh oh

Not Good! Sad

Na na na, come on!

alanbcohen
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 8 months ago
Joined: 2006-01-04 10:47
I spent some time checking

I spent some time checking out the Tor website and it seems to be a legit site with some reasonable, if paranoid (about web tracking) people. I found this reference on their download page (also note this is in reference to an 'unstable' release):

"Also, note that the Firefox in our bundle is modified from the default Firefox; we're currently working with Mozilla to see if they want us to change the name to make this clearer. "

While falling short of a credit attribution, it indicates a willingness to consider another person's work. This information may affect how John chooses to approach them.

RMB Fixed
Offline
Last seen: 14 years 3 months ago
Joined: 2006-10-24 10:30
..

You are complaining that a real Open-Source project is
distributing Mozillas FOSS-leecher licensed browser ?
They could take the whole thing and re-compile it as "TorFox" or whatever
and write in real small print somewhere "based on FireFox Portable by John T Haller",
instead they call it what it really is and include the Tor-button extension.
Wow, big deal ...

As for concern of web-tracking being "paranoid" : What planet are you from ?

John T. Haller
John T. Haller's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 30 min ago
AdminDeveloperModeratorTranslator
Joined: 2005-11-28 22:21
Trademarks

They make their code available under the GPL/LGPL/MPL and you can do whatever you want with it under those licenses. The only thing they say is "don't dilute our trademark by doing random stuff with it", which is what the Tor folks are doing by using the Mozilla binaries with all the Firefox trademarks intact. An open source license does not give you any rights to anyone else's trademarks.

Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!

alpha1
alpha1's picture
Offline
Last seen: 8 years 11 months ago
Joined: 2007-07-08 20:02
I was only complaining about

I was only complaining about the Mozilla copyrights and no attribution to us for the portablized applications

distribution of Firefox as is, is illegal.

Lead, Follow, or get out of the way.

John T. Haller
John T. Haller's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 30 min ago
AdminDeveloperModeratorTranslator
Joined: 2005-11-28 22:21
Confirmed

This is, in fact, an unauthorized repackaging. They're modifying Firefox without permission which is a violation of Mozilla's trademarks. While they'd be free to recompile Firefox into their own browser and bundle TorButton, etc, they'd have to call it something else (not Firefox, or FireWhatever or WhateverFox). It also appears that they're using all my portablization code for both Firefox and Pidgin without any attribution on their pages, which is pretty lame.

Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!

sergentsiler
sergentsiler's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 1 month ago
Joined: 2007-02-28 11:37
and since when....

is Tor doing bad things?!? i remember it back in the days of Torrify and TorPark and as far as i can tell, they have always been doing this. i remember the last time i downed Tor it had FF 2.0.0.14 Portable bundled with it and nobody complained then.

Zoop

ZachHudock
ZachHudock's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 3 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2006-12-06 18:07
it's still illegal....it just

it's still illegal....it just happened that nobody complained then.

The developer formerly known as ZGitRDun8705

John T. Haller
John T. Haller's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 30 min ago
AdminDeveloperModeratorTranslator
Joined: 2005-11-28 22:21
Not Tor

TorPark was not Tor. It was a third party. And Tor made him stop using the Tor name.

Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!

gluxon
gluxon's picture
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 7 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2008-06-21 19:26
So John, are you going to do

So John, are you going to do anything about it?

sergentsiler
sergentsiler's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 1 month ago
Joined: 2007-02-28 11:37
sure hope so...

sure hope so

Zoop

crux
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 5 months ago
Joined: 2008-06-13 18:10
Tor is important

See this four-minute video about why:

Overcoming Internet censorship-Part 3: Anticensorship tools
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xw3sXOARTwg

Tor is a noncommercial, free and open source project. I believe it to be worthy of our support.

I find it hard to believe that people here are really this concerned about Mozilla's trademarks. I trust that any issues, if any, between Mozilla and the Tor Project can be easily resolved.

alanbcohen
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 8 months ago
Joined: 2006-01-04 10:47
Please note the second part

Please note the second part of John's comment, which does reflect a GPL violation of direct concern to this site.
"It also appears that they're using all my portablization code for both Firefox and Pidgin without any attribution on their pages, which is pretty lame."
This applies even if they are in discussion with Mozilla to resolve the trademark issues (as John did earlier).

crux
Offline
Last seen: 3 years 5 months ago
Joined: 2008-06-13 18:10
It is with the software.

There is a html help page from PortableApps with a working donate button, as well as the Readme.txt from PortableApps and the Licence.txt with the GPL, and probably other stuff I didn't see. If there is a violation, the Tor Project should be notified. There is an IRC channel on freenode (#tor), but their main server is irc.oftc.net. They are reasonable people. I can't imagine they would violate the GPL as you say.

The software, by the way, is a must-have for me. This version ( http://www.torproject.org/torbrowser/index.html.en ) is portable, and is an easy way to test the Tor network. There are an increasing number of new hidden services in there.

torphobos
Offline
Last seen: 15 years 8 months ago
Joined: 2008-08-22 16:42
re: illegal distribution

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hello,

This is phobos from The Tor Project. A number of Tor users brought this
thread to our attention.

I sent an email to the business_development address on 2008-08-20 in
order to start a discussion with John T. Haller. To date, we have not
heard a response.

We believe we're using your software within the limits of the license
and do properly attribute to PortableApps as needed. Please let us know
if we're incorrect in our beliefs about this matter.

We look forward to an official response from Rare Ideas, LLC.

Thanks,

phobos
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iD8DBQFIryhdO50JPzGwl0sRApvMAKCig4It92nTh7IRc0rxRdyxsMkm2wCbBmdB
7pWBEcuSmQ+Fr3xw0ypT9y8=
=znfd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

John T. Haller
John T. Haller's picture
Offline
Last seen: 2 hours 30 min ago
AdminDeveloperModeratorTranslator
Joined: 2005-11-28 22:21
Responded

A response has been sent.

Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!

Log in or register to post comments