Ok, so whenever I see the question come up about combining GPL and proprietary software, it's almost always the proprietary dev asking can I use GPL code. My question is, can a GPL'ed program require a (free) proprietary module to work, by not distributing that module and just telling the user to go get it (provided the user can legally obtain this module, and in this case, for free)? My guess is yes, as in say the LAME plugin for Audacity. Just want to clear this up.
I'm quite sure the answer is no. The LAME plugin is GPLed.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!
The reason why LAME is not included with various packages is that the MP3 format is patented and the owner of the patent causes trouble, but did finally permit the hosting of the LAME program in one spot, but it may not be redistributed unfortunately.
The question here though is whether or not a GPL program can use a non-GPL download. The answer is yes.
I am a Christian and a developer and moderator here.
“A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.” – Proverbs 15:1
But doesn't a patent completely contradict the GPL?
PortableApps.com Advocate
The patent is not theirs. They've been given permission to use patented content.
But let's not get started arguing about stupid software patents...
I am a Christian and a developer and moderator here.
“A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.” – Proverbs 15:1
So long as it's not distributed with it, it's fine. Your GPL program can do what e'er it will once it's installed.
I am a Christian and a developer and moderator here.
“A soft answer turns away wrath, but a harsh word stirs up anger.” – Proverbs 15:1
My mistake with the bad example. And no, I am not planning on distributing the $0 non-OSS program. Thank you.
Quamquam omniam nescio, nec nihil scio.