You are here

Movienizer Portable Dev Test 1

5 posts / 0 new
Last post
judeah666
Offline
Last seen: 9 years 11 months ago
Joined: 2009-03-28 15:53
Movienizer Portable Dev Test 1

THIS IS MY FIRST POST

Application: Movienizer
Category: Music & Video
Description: Free Movie Organizer

[link removed due to lack of source / self promotion - moderator PP]

Love movies? Have a growing wish list in addition to a respectable collection? Having trouble navigating through the collection? Organize your movie collection with Movienizer for absolutely free!

What's new in Movienizer (Latest version is 1.9)

Version 1.9 (build 56) (02/10/09)

[!] Report builder has been added.
[!] Plugins support for transferring data from other catalog programs into Movienizer.
[+] Recognition of technical parameters for .mkv and other file types.
[+] Additional fields: awards, file size, video bitrate, video codec, added/modified/watched date.
[+] Sorting the movie list by title, release year, added date, disc number, rating.
[+] Movies/people are shown with their rating on the right.
[+] Capability of re-scanning technical parameters of a file/DVD.
[+] Length of short descriptions (synopses) can be adjusted.
[+] New scripts for Italian, Dutch and German online databases.
[*] Title recognition for adding movies from files improved.
[*] Scripts for some sites updated.
[-] Minor bug fixes.

[closed your strong tag Wink - moderator PP]

Patrick Patience
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 4 months ago
DeveloperModerator
Joined: 2007-02-20 19:26
Howdy How How!

Hey there Jude,

Although we do appreciate your contribution, we unfortunately only permit open source software to be posted in these forums currently. If you would like to post the source, feel free to throw that download link back up along with the source. Otherwise, I'm afraid we simply can't allow it yet. There will be a point in the future when we do allow closed source software, and I hope it's approaching soon but I really have no idea. Also, is it safe to assume your software is portable? Otherwise this might just appear to be blatant self-promotion... though I assume it is portable being posted here.

Sorry about that, and I hope you'll either post the source (if interested, of course) or just hang around until a point when we do allow it. Furthermore, the most important note I should make is that repackaging the software without the authors permission (assuming you're not the author) is illegal near 100% of the time.

judeah666
Offline
Last seen: 9 years 11 months ago
Joined: 2009-03-28 15:53
Sorry Bout that

Sorry bout that. Don't really know the diff between open source and freeware. i'll try and contact the author of the software. and i'm having trouble with the installer when i compiled and run then install the software and double click the launcher it opens my usb drive.

NathanJ79
NathanJ79's picture
Offline
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
Joined: 2007-07-31 15:07
Long story short - and there

Long story short - and there are a lot of exceptions - freeware generally means it's free to use, but not necessarily free to change or share again. Open source generally means it's free to change and share under the same license, but open source doesn't have to be free and freeware doesn't have to be open source.

PortableApps.com deals with FOSS - Free, Open Source Software - released under an OSI (Open Source Initiative) license. OSI is just one licensing organization; Creative Commons is another you may have heard of (the Wikis prefer CC). OSI-approved licenses let JTH & co. modify the apps to run more smoothly with the PortableApps.com Platform and also to host them on SourceForge, which only allows such software.

It's interesting to know that there are a lot of licenses out there. As an end-user, they all seem to mean the same thing. You ask a freeware license, an OSI-approved license, a Creative Commons license, and a customized license (e.g. the Nethack License) if you're free to download it and use it for personal use and they all say yes (provided they could talk). However, you go asking about altering the code and redistributing them, they're all going to have slightly different answers. By picking once licensing platform (in PA.c's case, OSI) they can carefully adhere to a single set of rules and it's easier for everyone to be on the same page.

If anyone more knowledgeable finds any faults with this post, please let me know. I'm still learning, myself.

Zach Thibeau
Zach Thibeau's picture
Offline
Last seen: 1 year 6 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2006-05-26 12:08
also note In the future we

also note
In the future we will do freeware applications just not yet so if you are not keen on the OSS Philosiphy don't give up on us yet Wink just wait until we have that section setup Smile

your friendly neighbourhood moderator Zach Thibeau

Log in or register to post comments