I wanted to bring my online games along with my thumbdrive, like MapleStory. I know they cannot be portablized due to admin power so I've found QEMU Manager, a GUI for QEMU.
The installation of a stripped down windows xp (microxp, yes, i know its illegail but many users use it) took about 30minutes in QEMU Manager while a real computer takes 5minutes.
It is still laggy when i download firefox, like the whole computer is dying. (KQEMU is not activated)
When i use a mac QEMU GUI, iQEMU, it is faster, slight jerk here and there, but it have colour problems, no internet(host have), and cannot load disk.
So i think that the GUI makes a difference. And i checked out QtEMU, and virt-manager, another GUI. They seem promising, but i cant check their speeds, which is a problem.
If anyone can test for me if its very slow without KQEMU, please post it here.
For virt manager testers, you can check if 3 fps(frame per second) makes a difference.
Any comments are welcome.
And no, portable virtualbox(vbox.me) needs admin to run it.
You are here
Does QEMU GUI makes any difference?
      February 19, 2011 - 3:36am
                
    
    
        
    #1
  
          Does QEMU GUI makes any difference?        
      
       
      
 Visit the Community page
 Visit the Community page Join our forums
 Join our forums Subscribe to our email newsletter
 Subscribe to our email newsletter Subscribe with RSS
 Subscribe with RSS Follow us on BlueSky
 Follow us on BlueSky Follow us on Facebook
 Follow us on Facebook Follow us on LinkedIn
 Follow us on LinkedIn Follow us on Mastodon
 Follow us on Mastodon
doesnt matter. Ive found the problem. Its with the host hardware, which slows my qemu manager.