Couldn't .Net framework be portable, if the main files were created as symbolic links pointing to the already installed files on portable?
New: fb2kPortable / foobar2000 (Apr 18, 2024), Platform 29.4 (Apr 10, 2024)
1,000+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
Please donate today
Visit the Community page
Join our forums
Subscribe to our email newsletter
Subscribe with RSS
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Mastodon
Follow us on BlueSky
If they merely point to the installed local files, that wouldn't be portable. If you have them on the drive but not installed they don't work. If you repackage them in a way that can be carried and work portably, it's a violation of the license... at least the only packages of it I've ever seen. .NET is designed to be OS-integrated, so it's not portable.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!