You are here

Firefox, TBird and high CPU usage under Linux

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
darkstar
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 5 months ago
Joined: 2008-04-03 03:14
Firefox, TBird and high CPU usage under Linux

I will post this here, although it appears to also apply to Thunderbird as well. When running either PortableApps Firefox, and/or Thunderbird on my openSuSE 12.2 Linux machines, I am seeing a very high CPU usage as reported by TOP. Memory seems fine, swap seems fine, and I don't see this issue when running either Firefox or Thunderbird native. I might suspect this is a Wine issue but I do not see other PortableApps using high amounts of the CPU... Thoughts? I see lots of similar problems being reported throughout the internet, but no common thread or solution... What should I do to track this down further?

Here is an example output from TOP -

Tasks: 216 total,   2 running, 213 sleeping,   0 stopped,   1 zombie
%Cpu(s): 21.9 us,  8.7 sy,  0.0 ni, 69.4 id,  0.0 wa,  0.0 hi,  0.0 si,  0.0 st
KiB Mem:  12288104 total,  9454520 used,  2833584 free,   703596 buffers
KiB Swap: 10482684 total,        0 used, 10482684 free,  7078884 cached

  PID USER      PR  NI  VIRT  RES  SHR S  %CPU %MEM    TIME+  COMMAND                                                
  477 marc      20   0 1767m 554m  16m S 125.8  4.6 339:53.03 firefox.exe                                            
32091 marc      20   0 1756m 140m  11m S  99.8  1.2 209:31.53 thunderbird.exe                                        
30700 root      20   0  210m  95m  46m S   5.3  0.8  13:59.83 Xorg                                                   
31873 marc      20   0 30876 9396  840 S   4.3  0.1   9:41.45 wineserver                                             
31107 marc      20   0  358m 102m  21m S   2.3  0.9   6:11.75 skype                                                  
 3942 marc      20   0 2605m  21m  12m S   1.7  0.2   0:01.27 notepad++.exe                                          
31715 marc      20   0  625m  32m  20m S   1.7  0.3   6:02.70 boinc-gui                                              
  950 marc      20   0 1754m  56m 8432 S   0.7  0.5   2:14.13 plugin-containe                                        
 6385 boinc     20   0  237m  18m 5292 S   0.7  0.2   9:49.52 boinc-client                                           
    3 root      20   0     0    0    0 S   0.3  0.0   0:16.09 ksoftirqd/0                                            
 2857 root      20   0     0    0    0 S   0.3  0.0   0:00.39 kworker/0:2                                            
 3059 marc      20   0 19204 1728 1204 R   0.3  0.0   0:00.25 top                                                    
31010 marc      20   0  829m 119m  44m S   0.3  1.0   0:40.74 plasma-desktop                                         
31096 marc      20   0  527m  50m  29m S   0.3  0.4   0:22.08 konsole                                                
    1 root      20   0 43812 4884 2044 S   0.0  0.0   0:01.64 systemd                                                
    2 root      20   0     0    0    0 S   0.0  0.0   0:00.03 kthreadd                                               
    6 root      rt   0     0    0    0 S   0.0  0.0   0:01.32 migration/0                                            
    7 root      -2   0     0    0    0 S   0.0  0.0   0:06.73 rcuc/0 

darkstar
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 5 months ago
Joined: 2008-04-03 03:14
Some additional info

Cannot say for certain if this is important, but will report it anywise....

I have noticed that often, when I initially start up Portable Firefox, or Thunderbird, the processes seems to consume "normal" i.e. low percentages of the CPU time. But after a while, either one or both will creep up and start to consume high percentages, according to TOP.

I did an strace -p on the corresponding processes, when running normally and when consuming high CPU percentages and got an interesting result.

Normal looks like an endless amount of this -

 strace -p1234
Process 1234 attached
[ Process PID=1234 runs in 32 bit mode. ]
read(6, "L\3633\0\0\0\0\0\2\1\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 16
sched_yield()                           = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT USR1 USR2 ALRM CHLD IO], [], 8) = 0
write(3, "~\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\17\0\0\0\17\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
read(4, "\3\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, {477841, 704266869}) = 0
sched_yield()                           = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT USR1 USR2 ALRM CHLD IO], [], 8) = 0
writev(3, [{"\30\0\0\0,\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\4\0\0\0L\3633\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64}, {"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 40}, {"\244\0\0\0", 4}], 3) = 108
read(4, "\3\1\0\0\0\0\0\0D\350\306\223?#\316\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
read(6, "L\3633\0\0\0\0\0\2\1\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 16
sched_yield()                           = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT USR1 USR2 ALRM CHLD IO], [], 8) = 0
write(3, "~\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\17\0\0\0\17\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
read(4, "\3\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, {477841, 805913299}) = 0
sched_yield()                           = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT USR1 USR2 ALRM CHLD IO], [], 8) = 0
writev(3, [{"\30\0\0\0,\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\4\0\0\0L\3633\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64}, {"\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 40}, {"\244\0\0\0", 4}], 3) = 108
read(4, "\3\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\274[\326\223?#\316\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0

and when consuming high CPU percentages I get an endless amount of this -

strace -p15025
Process 15025 attached
[ Process PID=15025 runs in 32 bit mode. ]
read(6, "\374\3223\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0", 16) = 16
recv(14, 0x7de0a328, 4096, 0)           = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
recv(14, 0x7de0a328, 4096, 0)           = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
recv(8, 0x7ddc5878, 4096, 0)            = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
futex(0x110070, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1)  = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT USR1 USR2 ALRM CHLD IO], [], 8) = 0
write(3, "~\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\17\1\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
read(4, "\3\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, {477489, 234524640}) = 0
recv(14, 0x7de0a328, 4096, 0)           = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
recv(14, 0x7de0a328, 4096, 0)           = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
recv(8, 0x7ddc5878, 4096, 0)            = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
sched_yield()                           = 0
futex(0x110070, FUTEX_WAKE_PRIVATE, 1)  = 1
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT USR1 USR2 ALRM CHLD IO], [], 8) = 0
write(3, "~\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\201\2\0\0\221\2\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
read(4, "\3\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_SETMASK, [], NULL, 8) = 0
clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC_RAW, {477489, 234750186}) = 0
recv(14, 0x7de0a328, 4096, 0)           = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
recv(14, 0x7de0a328, 4096, 0)           = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
recv(8, 0x7ddc5878, 4096, 0)            = -1 EAGAIN (Resource temporarily unavailable)
sched_yield()                           = 0
rt_sigprocmask(SIG_BLOCK, [HUP INT USR1 USR2 ALRM CHLD IO], [], 8) = 0
write(3, "~\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\1\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\0\2\0\0\r\2\0\0\0\0\0\0"..., 64) = 64

There seems like a high number of calls to clock_gettime, in both the Portable Firefox and Thunderbird processes, but what is happening to cause the "Resource temporarily unavailable" response? Internet searches are not turning up much helpful information yet, will keep searching... Any ideas?

Marc..

darkstar
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 5 months ago
Joined: 2008-04-03 03:14
Ping? No thoughts anyone?

Ping? No thoughts anyone?

Log in or register to post comments