Application: ePlayOrgan
Category: Music & Video
Description: A fully featured virtual pipe organ, many features are unique
Download ePlayOrgan Portable 3.0.8.1 Development Test 2 [18MB download / 38MB installed]
(MD5: 208c86bcc966a1aa54a5ab06dcb2af83)
Release Notes:
Development Test 2 (2019-08-26)
- Fully working version of eplayOrgan Portable. All problems found in Test 1 corrected, no known defects.
- Uses the standard Portable Apps Launcher.
- Tested on 32 bit Windows XP and 64 bit Windows 10. No problems.
- Tested on Mac (under Wine). Install in drive Z: No problems.
- Portable features not yet tested on Linux but it is known from previous tests that the base eplayOrgan program works OK on Linux under Wine
- Bug in Ubuntu Linux 16-04LTS 64bit Under Wine. Links to windows .exe's do not work (path problem). Bug probably in Wine. Launcher and eplayOrgan work OK otherwise.
.
Development Test 1 (2019-08-15): Initial release
- The eplayOrganPortable.exe has an unwanted dependency on a mingw .dll file. Use standard PA launcher.
- The package contains Burea_Church_Ext_2.02.sf2 sound font which is very large and not essential. Delete.
- The package contains many other unnecessary files. Delete unnecessary files.
- The Help files have not been fully updated for the Portable package. Update all help files for portable package..
Visit the Community page
Join our forums
Subscribe to our email newsletter
Subscribe with RSS
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Mastodon
Follow us on BlueSky
Please reformat your post using the template: https://portableapps.com/node/11965
Reformatted, see above.
There were still a couple errors in your layout, I've corrected those.
Thank you, I knew there was something wrong with those links but was not sure how they were supposed to work. I have never had to write a forum post in HTML before and your requirements are all new to me.
eplayOrganPortable has now been downloaded around 85 times, by Beta Testers I assume.
So far not one single comment even though I know that Test 1 has some obvious faults which anyone seriously testing the program would have seen almost instantly.
I have now released Test 2 which cures all the problems I found in the Test 1 issue. Test 2 version has no known faults - still not a single comment from a Beta Tester.
Am I doing something wrong or are your "official" testers simply not doing their job?
csw900