You are here

Built-in ad & tracker blocking in browsers

2 posts / 0 new
Last post
MD Abdul Kader
MD Abdul Kader's picture
Offline
Last seen: 5 hours 29 min ago
Joined: 2026-01-28 04:11
Built-in ad & tracker blocking in browsers

I have a general question about browsers that include built-in ad and tracker blocking. Brave Browser is often mentioned because it has native ad blocking and tracker protection without requiring extensions. I was wondering how PortableApps.com generally views browsers with built-in privacy features like this.

Recently I also came across Kahf Browser, which focuses on privacy and includes built-in ad and tracker blocking as well. From a user perspective, both seem similar in concept, though implemented differently.

My questions are:
- Are built-in ad/tracker blockers (like in Brave) considered a positive or negative from a portability standpoint?
- Do such features create additional challenges for making a browser truly portable?
- Are Chromium-based browsers with privacy features harder to support in portable environments compared to others?

I’m asking purely from a user and technical curiosity point of view, not requesting an app addition.

Ken Herbert
Ken Herbert's picture
Online
Last seen: 49 min 44 sec ago
DeveloperModerator
Joined: 2010-05-25 18:19
Privacy browsers are ok. Chromium-based browsers not so ok.

Are built-in ad/tracker blockers (like in Brave) considered a positive or negative from a portability standpoint?

Neither positive nor negative, really.

Do such features create additional challenges for making a browser truly portable?

They are just software features, and most software features do not affect portability directly. It is all about how those features are designed and coded, not the purpose or intent of the features themselves.

Software is either:

  1. designed to specifically be portable
  2. designed to specifically not be portable
  3. created with no thought towards being portable/not portable (which means it could be anywhere from already mostly portable to nearly impossible to make portable, and you'll never know until you try)

Are Chromium-based browsers with privacy features harder to support in portable environments compared to others?

Chromium is case #2 I listed above: designed to not be portable. It has some features and flags that are designed for portability (like a command line switch to move the user data dir), but then it has things like if you put it in Program Files it will ignore those portability settings. It also locks your install to a single PC by encrypting passwords and some other user data with a key that is unique to the computer. You can disable it, but then your passwords are stored as plain text.

And unfortunately one of the biggest and easiest privacy improvements that can be made to Chromium (removing the browser-level Google login) makes it almost impossible to make portable.

We have a standard of not adding any new Chromium-based browsers to the catalog unless Chromium or the individual browser does some significant work to make portability easier. That is the primary reason we don't have a release of Brave.

Log in or register to post comments