You are here

Apps page should only feature 'official' PortableApps

3 posts / 0 new
Last post
LOGAN-Portable
LOGAN-Portable's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 8 months ago
Developer
Joined: 2007-09-11 12:24
Apps page should only feature 'official' PortableApps

Having a list with Portable Apps is great, however I noticed some 3rd party ones in the list like XAMPP and Mac-on-Stick are 3rd party releases. Maybe these releases should be kept in a seperate list. Why? Because maybe the portability is okay I don't know in how far it can be considered a completely compatible app for the PA Platform.

Steve Lamerton
Steve Lamerton's picture
Offline
Last seen: 11 years 1 week ago
Developer
Joined: 2005-12-10 15:22
They

are only on there because they are completely portable, as far as I know anyway.

___

Author of Toucan

'...and do the other things, not because they are easy, but because they are hard...' JFK

Simeon
Simeon's picture
Offline
Last seen: 9 years 11 months ago
DeveloperTranslator
Joined: 2006-09-25 15:15
Yep

I think that too.
Otherwise, John wouldnt let them be there.
“I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong.” - Richard P. Feynman

"What about Love?" - "Overrated. Biochemically no different than eating large quantities of chocolate." - Al Pacino in The Devils Advocate

Log in or register to post comments