Is there a way to add the spell checker plugin to pidgin portable 2.1.1? I looked at the site and did a quick google search and located nothing. Thanks for any help.
New: fb2kPortable / foobar2000 (Apr 18, 2024), Platform 29.4 (Apr 10, 2024)
1,000+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
Please donate today
Visit the Community page
Join our forums
Subscribe to our email newsletter
Subscribe with RSS
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Mastodon
Follow us on BlueSky
1. Install ASpell locally
2. Copy ASpell into PidginPortable\App\Aspell
3. Uninstall Aspell from the PC
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!
Thank you very much.
What do you think about an Aspell installer?
I would do one.
Is it legal?
Could we include it here?
“I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong.” - Richard P. Feynman
"What about Love?" - "Overrated. Biochemically no different than eating large quantities of chocolate." - Al Pacino in The Devils Advocate
Although ASpell is open source (GPL, I believe), the dictionaries are not. So, they can't be hosted on SourceForge. Even distribution of many of them is legally questionable.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!
Thanks for the fast answer
“I can live with doubt and uncertainty and not knowing. I think it is much more interesting to live not knowing than to have answers that might be wrong.” - Richard P. Feynman
"What about Love?" - "Overrated. Biochemically no different than eating large quantities of chocolate." - Al Pacino in The Devils Advocate
So why not use/create a different dictionary that is open and compatible with Aspell?
Miranda apparently does, something about one from open office.
Have I missed something?
This question would be better asked at Aspell.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!
Are you sure?
http://aspell.net/win32 shows the English dictionary package as copyrighted, but installing it shows a licensure notice that is a mixture of copyleft and public licenses (standard stuff: commercial use has to get written permission, copyright notice must be maintained, etc).
The file for the English dictionary package itself is hosted at http://ftp.gnu.org.
The website that it shows for the English dictionary is hosted at http://wordlist.sourceforge.net The overwhelming majority of dictionaries listed there are explicitly GPL, even if the English dictionary is not.
So, between the license notice, where the package is hosted, and where the homepage for the word list is located ... I'd say that this qualifies as distributable, at the very least.
If it says "commercial use has to get written permission" then it's not open source.
http://www.opensource.org/docs/osd
It may be distributable... but not via SourceForge.net (our current download host), Google Code, etc.
Sometimes, the impossible can become possible, if you're awesome!
I see that, since it implies that permission could be denied.
I guess it's more of a question for ftp://ftp.gnu.org, but isn't it then in violation gnu.org hosting policies, too?
Aspell itself, and the dictionaries that are released as GPL? Would these be within scope still?