Portable Browsers run really sloooowwww...
Small Linux Distros run relatively fast...
What's the difference, other than the 100 MB?
Small Linux Distros have a copy2ram function that copies the entire OS into the ram.
Portable Browsers do not.
Would it be possible to make a Portable Browser that copies the whole of itself into the ram to
- Further delay flash drive wear, and
- Make the browsers run faster
I guess not. Unless if somebody is up to the challenge (the whole reason I posted this in the first place :P).
Download the Fedora 11 ISO and the live USB creator. Try that
Too many lonely hearts in the real world
Too many bridges you can burn
Too many tables you can't turn
Don't wanna live my life in the real world
On the Amiga (old Commodore computer), if you had the 256K expansion memory module, you had an icon on the desktop called RAM DISK, which looked like a floppy, only black. You could copy applications to it, and they would run really, really fast (they were responsive, not skipping). Naturally RAM DISK emptied on each reboot.
It's a shame Windows doesn't have a RAM DISK function. Technically it does, but it doesn't work the same. Then again the Amiga had a bunch of stuff Windows still doesn't have, ironically enough. Two-frame icons (idle/active), cursor editor, command prompt right on the desktop, and multi-tasking at 512KB RAM (Bill Gates said you'd need 8MB.)
I mean if caching is off, the browser it self is loaded, it will write few cookies and similar small things but what else?
I that case it is same as dls or puppy.
Otto Sykora
Basel, Switzerland
.... RunLocally doesn't work?
--
Insert original signature here with Greasemonkey Script.
I found an admin-only solution here, but if anyone finds a non privileged solution I would be happy to hear about it.
But there’s no sense crying over every mistake,
You just keep on trying till you run out of cake.