KeePass Professional Portable 2.14 Development Test 2

I was saying the same thing... except with a Launcher and being able to choose where to Put Portable Java & Mono, making a Portable shortcut with a bat file or something and put a note in the file path that the file is somewhere else.

An Idea - P.A. Shortcut Grounds

• Runs in the Background
• Starts when USB stick is insert [Use this for P.A. Platform]
• Make a shortcut of folder, program or L.O.T.
• L.O.T. Shortcut; Look over there, which if a program is look for a folder and not a shortcut then L.O.T. would say I'm a folder named so and so with this files
• P.A. Shortcut Grounds launches shortcut for you

Reference

1. How to create shortcuts with a relative path for use on USB drives
2. That relative paths are controlled by programs rather than or through the Desktop.ini (Which would be so an awesome Idea; File use this File, Extensions open with this Program, Folder go Here, All together under This) and that the program has to be running
3. This means the path is relative to either from the Program meaning
   X:/7zip/7z.dll, 7zFM.exe = from 7zFM.exe/7zip/X: then X:/7zip/7z.dll

(I didn't write it in code because I don't think a Developer or Hacker would deem it )

Other Info

1. Whitecloudsoft - Shortcuts Pool
2. This came close, but what I tried to do to make it so I didn't have to click so much was dropping it in the Root/Starting/First Click on the drive page of my USB stick and to make it look clean [I'm on another computer right now, so that why I could] I though I could hide the files, but the program couldn't find its own files when hidden.

1. SmithTech - Shortcut Creator 4U3
2. Its only for U3 Smart usb sticks

1. Forty-Three of The Best Free Windows Enhancements That You Should Know About
2. Fences; This gives me idea for the PA Platform to have its own explorer like 7zip.

But remember I'm a User of Computer so this ideas are a exterior to that of a Hacker or Developer and I meant that in a thinking car's faster based on the outside...but by thinking a little harder its become more like aerodynamics thinking...but I'm still scratching the surface...or digging...with a shovel.

Someone once told me its not copy and paste...that is true, but I'm trying to say is, to bring a lot of good ideas into one place like Cheat Engine & MHS, one user friendly, but another can work without Admin Rights, though I don't have to keep both.

I'm sure somebody will correct me if I'm wrong but because some people don't consider the dependency on .NET to be an issue (they use a limited set of computers known to have .NET installed). There's nothing to stop you distributing the app itself (license permitting), you just can't distribute a .NET platform with it.

It's been heavily debated whether .NET apps should be considered portable or not, and most "lay users" don't care because in there experience they've typically found .NET to be available. For "portable purists" the experience/reality may be different. It all comes down to your definition of portable and how you intend to use the apps.

My issue with that, however, is that if the launcher app were running in the background, I should see it *somewhere* in my system resources. I see it nowhere, not when using the default Task Manager in Windows 7, not when using SysInternals' Process Explorer and not when using Process Hacker (my choice for TM replacement). Hence, my thought was that such a TSR did not exist.

However, if I understand it better now, the launcher app actually *does* terminate itself, and then is called back up again if I exit KeePass normally, to perform the final tasks, whereas my method of closing (killing) the KP task via my TM is not allowing the launcher to run its final tasks, correct?

That is the only way it can make sense - because I can show you more than a few pics of how KeePass is running from the portable branch of my USB drive and how the only item listed with KeePass is the KeePass executable itself, and there is absolutely no app with portable in it anywhere.

Of course, that leads to another thought - I did replace the default v2.14 with the executable from 2.15 that I DL'd from the KeePass site, so that, in and of itself, may be the inherent problem?