Hi All,
I'm sure this will sound like a noob question but,
If I am using FFP2, with a "master password" active, is there a reason I would want to use KPP?
Or am I completely missing something?
Tim
New: Kanri (Oct 9, '24), Platform 29.5.3 (Jun 27, '24)
1,100+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
No Ads November!, Please donate today
Hi Tim,
I think there are some reasons to use KPP in favor to FFP's integrated password manager:
o KeePass (Portable) is a general purpose password database were you could save all kind of password (e.g. transactions numbers for online banking, serial numbers, files like pgp keys or registrationsfiles, PINs and PUKs for cellular phone SIMs, and other not primary internet related password)
o KeePass (Portable) is more secure as it uses a stronger encryption method and even encrypt the passwords in memory when running; as FF has a relatively large userbase there are huge struggles to find and exploit weaknesses by criminal elements - and therefor it is much less reliable as password safe (phissing, hijacking etc.)
o with Auto-Type, command line arguments and a kind of scriptable system it is much more flexible (regarding login procedures) and can be used for not internet related stuff like TrueCrypt etc
o last but not least the passwords can be organized more intuitive with hierarchical groups and comments
OK, they are all valid for me and mustn't be for you
Cya Ryushi
Not to forget :
keepass has a password-generator that makes passwords that are
actually safe !
Thank you Ryushi and RBM for all the information. I will look into it.
For me FFP2 fits my current needs but as a general database of password/private data I could see a value in KPP.
Thanks again
Tim
Things have got to get better, they can't get worse, or can they?