--
As all of ya should know Micro$oft is the Evil Empire, and Windows (a.k.a. Winblows or Windoze) is their greatest general, so please make a difference and install Linux or FreeBSD on yer Windows comp.
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Rick Cook
Linux apps are already on development. The problem is that they don't know a lot about Linux programming (but I can't complain because I don't know programming at all ).
Most 99% of the time you are going to be able to your flash drive with portable apps on a Windows PC. They are few public/business/school Mac or Linux PC's. The portable apps would not help you if you have a Linux PC at home, Windows at work, and a Mac at school.
The good thing about Portable Apps and Open Source!
Most of the software I use on my Windows AND Linux PC is open source. So you can use your open source Portable Apps to access files in Windows at work/school/library, and use the same Linux version of the software to open or edit the files at home on Linux. Not sure about MAC, they may be out of luck. I guess my point is... I LOVE PORTABLE APPS!
Joble
wsm23, I think you're one of the most knowledgeable posters here, I always learn something from your input. Thx.
I don't need the same FFP (as an example) on Mac and Windows computers, just the same profile. I can build the profile twice, and use different versions of FFP depending on which computer I'm at. It requires a little extra maintenance, but it's better than being stuck without my browser completely.
wms32: there is no registry on Linux (except on Gnome desktop environment that uses a very basic version of this to change ONLY the Gnome settings, not used by another programs); it is all saved on folders on the Home folder (the same as you profile folder on windows, but also a my docs folder).
And yehoni, the same profile can be used for both; the ideal is to use the custom paths used actually plus a "linuxversion" folder inside "app" folder that uses the same profile.
Yes, but using the same profiles has become more difficult and almost impossible. For example I used to share mt firefox profile between many linux partitions and windows editing the profile.ini file to point to a shared profile. However this no longer works since FF V 1.6. What I am wishing for, is a purely linux version of these applications using the portable apps gui start menu. One could have the mac, windows, and linux versions on their stick and whatever one for what ever platform. Any way just a wish list as being a geek I love and use all platforms.
Thanks for the replies.
Are you sure? A few time ago I copied my FFP profile to a local profile in Linux and worked like a charm (backup problems, don't ask). It was the 2.0.0.6 version.
And a solution if this doesn't work is a sync program, that, after FFP for windows is closed, this would translate the modified profile for linux, and vice-versa. The only problem are the extensions that don't work for windows, or for linux, and these are automatically disabled if not supported.
Another problem is the fragmented nature of the GNU/Linux and *BSD file structures. Installing a program will put some files in /usr/bin, some in /usr/share, some in /usr/local, some in /usr/local/share, some in /opt etc. etc. This means that the program will have to be built to be self-contained in a way where the program doesn't start looking for standard libraries in the main system libraries, as there is no guarantee that they will be of a compatible version.
__
Linux user no. 353252, occasionally tied to a Windows machine
__
Linux user no. 353252, occasionally tied to a Windows machine
My main "desire" is to be able to run Linux at home and Windows at work, and continue to share settings for Firefox and Thunderbird (at least) between the two using my USB stick.
As such, a solution such as QEMU which would let me run a virtualized Linux under Windows would be fine by me. In fact, it would pretty much be ideal
That said, something else that would simplify such sharing if its easier to create would also be ok by me. I just know that I'd like to avoid going back to where I was before I started using PortableApps. It has made my life a LOT simpler.
John will do Mac and Linux versions.
--
As all of ya should know Micro$oft is the Evil Empire, and Windows (a.k.a. Winblows or Windoze) is their greatest general, so please make a difference and install Linux or FreeBSD on yer Windows comp.
If they become more prominent. I see Mac OSX losing ground and Linux gaining ground in the future.
----
"For a list of all the ways technology has failed to improve the quality of life, please press three."
Alice Kahn
-Please search before posting
"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning." - Rick Cook
Linux apps are already on development. The problem is that they don't know a lot about Linux programming (but I can't complain because I don't know programming at all ).
____________________
The Blogger of Portimão or O Blogger de Portimão. Free your mind...
Blue is everything.
Most 99% of the time you are going to be able to your flash drive with portable apps on a Windows PC. They are few public/business/school Mac or Linux PC's. The portable apps would not help you if you have a Linux PC at home, Windows at work, and a Mac at school.
--
Life is about the journey not the destination!
My site * My Blog
The Kazoo Spartan
Life is about the journey not the destination!
The Kazoo Spartan
The good thing about Portable Apps and Open Source!
Most of the software I use on my Windows AND Linux PC is open source. So you can use your open source Portable Apps to access files in Windows at work/school/library, and use the same Linux version of the software to open or edit the files at home on Linux. Not sure about MAC, they may be out of luck. I guess my point is... I LOVE PORTABLE APPS!
Joble
wsm23, I think you're one of the most knowledgeable posters here, I always learn something from your input. Thx.
Fight in the Shade.
Have an Awesome Day!
My point was though. The portable versions you see here and mostly that support profile/data carrying are not cross platform.
I really don't know much about Linux to know if it has an evil thing like a registry.
--
Life is about the journey not the destination!
My site * My Blog
The Kazoo Spartan
Life is about the journey not the destination!
The Kazoo Spartan
I don't need the same FFP (as an example) on Mac and Windows computers, just the same profile. I can build the profile twice, and use different versions of FFP depending on which computer I'm at. It requires a little extra maintenance, but it's better than being stuck without my browser completely.
wms32: there is no registry on Linux (except on Gnome desktop environment that uses a very basic version of this to change ONLY the Gnome settings, not used by another programs); it is all saved on folders on the Home folder (the same as you profile folder on windows, but also a my docs folder).
____________________
The Blogger of Portimão or O Blogger de Portimão. Free your mind...
Blue is everything.
And yehoni, the same profile can be used for both; the ideal is to use the custom paths used actually plus a "linuxversion" folder inside "app" folder that uses the same profile.
____________________
The Blogger of Portimão or O Blogger de Portimão. Free your mind...
Blue is everything.
Yes, but using the same profiles has become more difficult and almost impossible. For example I used to share mt firefox profile between many linux partitions and windows editing the profile.ini file to point to a shared profile. However this no longer works since FF V 1.6. What I am wishing for, is a purely linux version of these applications using the portable apps gui start menu. One could have the mac, windows, and linux versions on their stick and whatever one for what ever platform. Any way just a wish list as being a geek I love and use all platforms.
Thanks for the replies.
Are you sure? A few time ago I copied my FFP profile to a local profile in Linux and worked like a charm (backup problems, don't ask). It was the 2.0.0.6 version.
And a solution if this doesn't work is a sync program, that, after FFP for windows is closed, this would translate the modified profile for linux, and vice-versa. The only problem are the extensions that don't work for windows, or for linux, and these are automatically disabled if not supported.
____________________
The Blogger of Portimão or O Blogger de Portimão. Free your mind...
Blue is everything.
Another problem is the fragmented nature of the GNU/Linux and *BSD file structures. Installing a program will put some files in /usr/bin, some in /usr/share, some in /usr/local, some in /usr/local/share, some in /opt etc. etc. This means that the program will have to be built to be self-contained in a way where the program doesn't start looking for standard libraries in the main system libraries, as there is no guarantee that they will be of a compatible version.
__
Linux user no. 353252, occasionally tied to a Windows machine
__
Linux user no. 353252, occasionally tied to a Windows machine
My main "desire" is to be able to run Linux at home and Windows at work, and continue to share settings for Firefox and Thunderbird (at least) between the two using my USB stick.
As such, a solution such as QEMU which would let me run a virtualized Linux under Windows would be fine by me. In fact, it would pretty much be ideal
That said, something else that would simplify such sharing if its easier to create would also be ok by me. I just know that I'd like to avoid going back to where I was before I started using PortableApps. It has made my life a LOT simpler.
FWIW,
Ewan