A suitably packaged Mac ... um package can run an execuable sraight off of removable media. Plus none of that crazy Windows registery stuff with UNIX .rc files.
Lol Mac Apps may be able to run from any device/folder but it still makes settings files (usually in the \Library\ or \Users\\Library\ folder) so therefore they aren't portable by the PortableApps.com definition. BUT check out http://www.freesmug.org/portableapps/ It has some awesome OPEN SOURCE (YAY ^_^) PortableApps for the mac And most of them are Universal Binary so they can work on both Intel/PowerPC macs ^_^
oh and BTW MACS IZ TEH AWESOMEZ! iPwn
Thanks,
Bensawsome
iLike Macs, iPwn, However you put it... Apple is better ^_^
"Claiming that your operating system is the best in the world because more people use it is like saying McDonalds makes the best food in the world..."
With the drag-and-drop nature of the Mac OS, I'm surprised all Mac apps aren't already portable.
A suitably packaged Mac ... um package can run an execuable sraight off of removable media. Plus none of that crazy Windows registery stuff with UNIX .rc files.
Lol Mac Apps may be able to run from any device/folder but it still makes settings files (usually in the \Library\ or \Users\\Library\ folder) so therefore they aren't portable by the PortableApps.com definition. BUT check out http://www.freesmug.org/portableapps/ It has some awesome OPEN SOURCE (YAY ^_^) PortableApps for the mac And most of them are Universal Binary so they can work on both Intel/PowerPC macs ^_^
oh and BTW MACS IZ TEH AWESOMEZ! iPwn
Thanks,
Bensawsome
iLike Macs, iPwn, However you put it... Apple is better ^_^
"Claiming that your operating system is the best in the world because more people use it is like saying McDonalds makes the best food in the world..."