Would it be possible to port a VNC application like RealVNC? If not the server then the viewer would be just as good. 
New: Kanri (Oct 9, '24), Platform 29.5.3 (Jun 27, '24)
1,100+ portable packages, 1.1 billion downloads
No Ads November!, Please donate today
Visit the Community page
Join our forums
Subscribe to our email newsletter
Subscribe with RSS
Follow us on Facebook
Follow us on LinkedIn
Follow us on Twitter
Follow us on Mastodon
Follow us on BlueSky
ChrisControl
VNC Free Edition
GenControl
are already portables
_______________________________________
345 portable applications:
http://standalone.atspace.org/index.html
TightVNC has better compression in my opinion, and both the server and viewer are portable
6GB QuickiDrive
Ceedo / PStart
1.5 GB of portable application Goodness!
6GB QuickiDrive
Ceedo / PStart / Xoblite
1.5 GB of portable application Goodness!
Thank, I will check it
_______________________________________
345 portable applications:
http://standalone.atspace.org/index.html
Depends on your definition of "poretable", I guess... I'm all for TightVNC, but it seems as if it actually uses the registry to store settings, which means 1) that your settings will not be portable, and 2) that the system you use it on will get junk in its registry.
TightVNC free viewer: Uses registry to store settings.
ChrisControl: Uses registry to store settings.
GenControl: Doesn't seem to want to connect to existing VNC sessions, which makes it unusable to me.
Research was done by use of Regmon.
Personally, I'm still looking. I will not consider any application that uses the registry as truly "portable", for the aforementioned reasons.
my registry Rapper program to male any program that use the registry and make it portable. Check it out here: http://portasoft.stsolutions.us/e107/page.php?4
***********************************
Deuce {The Core}
"Portable Software: Just the beginning..."
Deuce
Portable Software: Just the beginning.
https://portableapps.com/node/884